環保專案成果報告查詢系統

專案計畫編號
經費年度	108
計畫經費	3,800 千元
專案開始日期	2019/11/13
專案結束日期	2019/12/31
專案主持人	陳俊能
主辦單位	雲林縣環境保護局
承辦人	侯冠宇
執行單位	捷思環能股份有限公司
專案分類	環境監測及檢測
中文關鍵字	相對準確度測試查核、偏移校正因子、不透光率
英文關鍵字	RATA, BAF, OP
協同主持人
共同主持人
計畫聯絡人	吳采玲
計畫聯絡電話	05-5321238#20
計畫聯絡信箱	cailing@jsene.com

中文摘要	本計畫於108年11月13日開始執行，工作內容包含CEMS原始訊號擷取連線、連線法規符合度查核、相對準確度測試(RATA)檢測作業與監督檢測、二氧化氮/一氧化氮(NO2/NO)轉化器效率查核作業、不透光率監督查核及CEMS法規說明會辦理，本報告期間各項工作執行成果，主要如下： (1)已完成5根次連續自動監測設施(CEMS)原始訊號擷取連線，本次比對作業期間，廠方均依許可規範正常操作，測試過程未發現異常製程調整規避現象。 (2)完成11根次排放管道法規符合度查核，查核結果無須立即改善之缺失，另有提醒廠方因應管理辦法之更新公告，須依時程辦理相關計畫書修正並重新提送等事宜。 (3)已於108年12月12日完成辦理CEMS法規說明會1場，針對管理辦法第一、二階段修正公告內容進行說明，另針對107年度計畫自設之CEMS網站向各廠方代表進行使用宣導。 (4)針對連線資料查核及維護連線系統功能與通訊環境，各廠各月份之日/月報傳輸情形皆符合管理辦法規範，日報資料於隔日上午十一時前傳輸至環保局，每月監測報表則於次月十五日前須上傳完畢。 (5)完成5根次排放管道RATA稽查檢測，各管道檢測結果均符合管理辦法性能規格測試規定。其中麥寮汽電股份有限公司排放管道P201之排放流率的差值平均大於信賴係數，需進行偏移校正因子(BAF)修正；福懋興業股份有限公司排放管道P002之氧氣的差值平均大於信賴係數，需進行偏移校正因子(BAF)修正；塑化公司麥寮三廠公用廠排放管道PD01之氧氣及一氧化碳的差值平均大於信賴係數，需進行偏移校正因子(BAF)修正；塑化公司麥寮一廠輕油廠PT01之氧氣的差值平均大於信賴係數，需進行偏移校正因子(BAF)修正。 (6)完成2根次監督檢測，分別為塑化公司麥寮一廠輕油廠排放管道P401及麥寮汽電股份有限公司排放管道P201，各管道檢測結果均符合管理辦法儀器性能規格測試規定。 (7)完成10根次二氧化氮/一氧化氮(NO2/NO)轉化器效率查核作業，分別為塑化公司麥寮一廠輕油廠排放管道P701、台化公司海豐廠(芳香烴三廠)排放管道PG01、台化公司海豐廠(芳香烴二廠)排放管道PP06、塑化公司麥寮三廠公用廠排放管道PD01、南亞公司麥寮分公司排放管道P001、福懋興業公司排放管道P001、日友環保公司排放管道P002、塑化公司麥寮一廠公用廠排放管道P05A、麥寮汽電股份有限公司排放管道P201及塑化公司麥寮二廠公用廠排放管道P201，查核結果均符合性能規格規範≧90%之規定。
中文關鍵字	相對準確度測試查核、偏移校正因子、不透光率

中文摘要

本計畫於108年11月13日開始執行，工作內容包含CEMS原始訊號擷取連線、連線法規符合度查核、相對準確度測試(RATA)檢測作業與監督檢測、二氧化氮/一氧化氮(NO2/NO)轉化器效率查核作業、不透光率監督查核及CEMS法規說明會辦理，本報告期間各項工作執行成果，主要如下： (1)已完成5根次連續自動監測設施(CEMS)原始訊號擷取連線，本次比對作業期間，廠方均依許可規範正常操作，測試過程未發現異常製程調整規避現象。 (2)完成11根次排放管道法規符合度查核，查核結果無須立即改善之缺失，另有提醒廠方因應管理辦法之更新公告，須依時程辦理相關計畫書修正並重新提送等事宜。 (3)已於108年12月12日完成辦理CEMS法規說明會1場，針對管理辦法第一、二階段修正公告內容進行說明，另針對107年度計畫自設之CEMS網站向各廠方代表進行使用宣導。 (4)針對連線資料查核及維護連線系統功能與通訊環境，各廠各月份之日/月報傳輸情形皆符合管理辦法規範，日報資料於隔日上午十一時前傳輸至環保局，每月監測報表則於次月十五日前須上傳完畢。 (5)完成5根次排放管道RATA稽查檢測，各管道檢測結果均符合管理辦法性能規格測試規定。其中麥寮汽電股份有限公司排放管道P201之排放流率的差值平均大於信賴係數，需進行偏移校正因子(BAF)修正；福懋興業股份有限公司排放管道P002之氧氣的差值平均大於信賴係數，需進行偏移校正因子(BAF)修正；塑化公司麥寮三廠公用廠排放管道PD01之氧氣及一氧化碳的差值平均大於信賴係數，需進行偏移校正因子(BAF)修正；塑化公司麥寮一廠輕油廠PT01之氧氣的差值平均大於信賴係數，需進行偏移校正因子(BAF)修正。 (6)完成2根次監督檢測，分別為塑化公司麥寮一廠輕油廠排放管道P401及麥寮汽電股份有限公司排放管道P201，各管道檢測結果均符合管理辦法儀器性能規格測試規定。 (7)完成10根次二氧化氮/一氧化氮(NO2/NO)轉化器效率查核作業，分別為塑化公司麥寮一廠輕油廠排放管道P701、台化公司海豐廠(芳香烴三廠)排放管道PG01、台化公司海豐廠(芳香烴二廠)排放管道PP06、塑化公司麥寮三廠公用廠排放管道PD01、南亞公司麥寮分公司排放管道P001、福懋興業公司排放管道P001、日友環保公司排放管道P002、塑化公司麥寮一廠公用廠排放管道P05A、麥寮汽電股份有限公司排放管道P201及塑化公司麥寮二廠公用廠排放管道P201，查核結果均符合性能規格規範≧90%之規定。

中文關鍵字

相對準確度測試查核、偏移校正因子、不透光率

類型	檔名	檔案大小	說明	最新版公開日期
期末報告	YLEPB-108073.pdf	21MB		2020/7/24 上午 12:00:00

摘要	The project commenced on 13th August, 2019 with scope of works including the Continuous Emissions Monitoring System (CEMS) original signal online, inspecting compliance with online standards, the Relative Accuracy Test Audit (RATA) inspections and monitoring, the efficiency inspections on NO2/NO transformer, the OP inspections and holding the CEMS regulations explanation conference. The works completed during project’s period are summarized as followings: 1.Completing 5 times the CEMS original signal online, and factories all operated by the standards, therefore there were no abnormal operating action during the process. 2.Completing 11 times inspections of the compliance with flue regulations, and there was no fault to be immediately improved. Furthermore, reminding the factories to be aware of new managing regulations’ announcement, in order to revise and resend the proposals in time. 3.Completing one CEMS regulations explanation conference on 12th December, 2019, and explaining the first and second stage modification contents of managing regulations. Furthermore, presenting the CEMS website designed in 2018 and demonstrating to the factories that how to use it. 4.On online information inspection and online system ＆ communication environment maintaining, the daily/monthly reports from each factory were all met to the managing regulations. The daily reports had to be delivered to EPB by 11 am, next day; and monthly monitoring reports had to be delivered by the 15th, next month. 5.Completing 5 times RATA inspections, and the results were met to the standards. Furthermore, the mass emission rate’s mean deviation of P201 (Mai-Liao Power) was larger than confidence coefficient, so need to be taken the Bias Adjustment Factor (BAF) modification; the O2’s mean deviation of P002 (Formosa Taffeta) was larger than confidence coefficient, so need to be taken the BAF modification; the O2 and CO’s mean deviation of PD01 (Formosa Mai-Liao Plant3) was larger than confidence coefficient, so need to be taken the BAF modification; the O2’s mean deviation of PT01 (Naphtha Cracking Plant, Formosa Mai-Liao Plant1) was larger than confidence coefficient, so need to be taken the BAF modification. 6.Completing 2 times monitoring inspections on the Naphtha Cracking Plant of Formosa Mai-Liao Plant1 (P401) and the flues of Mai-Liao Power (P201), all results were met to the equipment functional testing standards of managing regulations. 7.Completing 10 times efficiency inspections on NO2/NO transformers, including the Naphtha Cracking Plant of Formosa Mai-Liao Plant1 (P701), the ARO-3 of Formosa Chemicals ＆ Fibre Corporation (PG01), the ARO-2 of Formosa Chemicals & Fibre Corporation (PP06), the discharged pipes of Formosa Mai-Liao Plant3 (PD01), the discharged pipes of Nan Ya Plastics in Mai-Liao (P001), the discharged pipes of Formosa Taffeta (P001), the discharged pipes of Sunny Friend (P002), the discharged pipes of Formosa Mai-Liao Plant1 (P05A), the discharged pipes of Mai-Liao Power (P201) and the discharged pipes of Formosa Mai-Liao Plant2 (P201), all results were met to the functional standards(≧90%).
英文關鍵字	RATA, BAF, OP

摘要

The project commenced on 13th August, 2019 with scope of works including the Continuous Emissions Monitoring System (CEMS) original signal online, inspecting compliance with online standards, the Relative Accuracy Test Audit (RATA) inspections and monitoring, the efficiency inspections on NO2/NO transformer, the OP inspections and holding the CEMS regulations explanation conference. The works completed during project’s period are summarized as followings: 1.Completing 5 times the CEMS original signal online, and factories all operated by the standards, therefore there were no abnormal operating action during the process. 2.Completing 11 times inspections of the compliance with flue regulations, and there was no fault to be immediately improved. Furthermore, reminding the factories to be aware of new managing regulations’ announcement, in order to revise and resend the proposals in time. 3.Completing one CEMS regulations explanation conference on 12th December, 2019, and explaining the first and second stage modification contents of managing regulations. Furthermore, presenting the CEMS website designed in 2018 and demonstrating to the factories that how to use it. 4.On online information inspection and online system ＆ communication environment maintaining, the daily/monthly reports from each factory were all met to the managing regulations. The daily reports had to be delivered to EPB by 11 am, next day; and monthly monitoring reports had to be delivered by the 15th, next month. 5.Completing 5 times RATA inspections, and the results were met to the standards. Furthermore, the mass emission rate’s mean deviation of P201 (Mai-Liao Power) was larger than confidence coefficient, so need to be taken the Bias Adjustment Factor (BAF) modification; the O2’s mean deviation of P002 (Formosa Taffeta) was larger than confidence coefficient, so need to be taken the BAF modification; the O2 and CO’s mean deviation of PD01 (Formosa Mai-Liao Plant3) was larger than confidence coefficient, so need to be taken the BAF modification; the O2’s mean deviation of PT01 (Naphtha Cracking Plant, Formosa Mai-Liao Plant1) was larger than confidence coefficient, so need to be taken the BAF modification. 6.Completing 2 times monitoring inspections on the Naphtha Cracking Plant of Formosa Mai-Liao Plant1 (P401) and the flues of Mai-Liao Power (P201), all results were met to the equipment functional testing standards of managing regulations. 7.Completing 10 times efficiency inspections on NO2/NO transformers, including the Naphtha Cracking Plant of Formosa Mai-Liao Plant1 (P701), the ARO-3 of Formosa Chemicals ＆ Fibre Corporation (PG01), the ARO-2 of Formosa Chemicals & Fibre Corporation (PP06), the discharged pipes of Formosa Mai-Liao Plant3 (PD01), the discharged pipes of Nan Ya Plastics in Mai-Liao (P001), the discharged pipes of Formosa Taffeta (P001), the discharged pipes of Sunny Friend (P002), the discharged pipes of Formosa Mai-Liao Plant1 (P05A), the discharged pipes of Mai-Liao Power (P201) and the discharged pipes of Formosa Mai-Liao Plant2 (P201), all results were met to the functional standards(≧90%).

英文關鍵字

RATA, BAF, OP